Making causal inferences with ordinal data
Read Online

Making causal inferences with ordinal data by H. T. Reynolds

  • 842 Want to read
  • ·
  • 25 Currently reading

Published by Institute for Research in Social Science, University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill .
Written in English


  • Political science -- Methodology.

Book details:

Edition Notes

Includes bibliographical references.

Statementby H.T. Reynolds.
SeriesWorking papers in methodology -- no.5.
LC ClassificationsJA73 .R39
The Physical Object
Paginationxi, 280 p.
Number of Pages280
ID Numbers
Open LibraryOL20671983M

Download Making causal inferences with ordinal data


Treatment effects/Causal inference Stata's treatment effects allow you to estimate experimental-type causal effects from observational data. Whether you are interested in a continuous, binary, count, fractional, or survival outcome; whether you are modeling the outcome process or treatment process; Stata can estimate your treatment effect. H.T. Reynolds is the author of Analysis of Nominal Data ( avg rating, 1 rating, 1 review, published ), Making Causal Inferences with Ordinal Data /5.   We argue that this taboo against causal inference in nonexperimental psychology impairs study design and data analysis, holds back cumulative research, leads to a disconnect between original findings and how they are interpreted in subsequent work, and limits the relevance of nonexperimental psychology for policymaking. Causal inference for ordinal outcomes Alexander Volfovsky, Edoardo M. Airoldi, and Donald B. Rubin Department of Statistics, Harvard University January 7, Alexander M. Volfovsky is an NSF Postdoctoral Fellow in the Department of Statistics at Harvard University ([email protected]).

  Download PDF Abstract: Many outcomes of interest in the social and health sciences, as well as in modern applications in computational social science and experimentation on social media platforms, are ordinal and do not have a meaningful scale. Causal analyses that leverage this type of data, termed ordinal non-numeric, require careful treatment, as much of the classical potential .   The Book of Why. 2. Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference. 3. Causal Inference in Statistics: A Primer. I personally think that the first one is good for a general audience since it also gives a good glimpse into the history of statistics and causality and then goes a bit more into the theory behind causal inference.   growing literature on causal inference in the social sciences (Pearl, ; Imbens and Rubin, ; Hernan and Robins, ). The key to connecting the two traditions is recognizing the central role of discovery when using text data for causal inferences. Discovery is central to text-based causal inferences because text is complex and.   Hernán and Robins next give an extensive discussion of the necessity for interventions to be well defined in order to make causal inferences. They use the example of obesity to elucidate the problems with drawing causal inferences from observational studies where the exposure of interest does not necessarily clearly relate to a specific.

  It's not published or even completed yet, but Hernan & Robins will end up being probably the best single volume introduction to the basic ideas of causal inference. It might be tempting to simply rely on more data (big data), but it would be a mistake. Even though we can observe correlation, it does not prove causation. Judea Pearl and Dana Mackenzie’s The Book of Why. The New Science of Cause and Effect highlights the main limitations of current machine learning solutions and the causal inference.   The book focuses on randomised controlled trials and well-defined interventions as the basis of causal inference from both experimental and observational data. As the authors show, even with randomised experiments, the analysis often requires using observational causal inference tools due to factors like selection and measurement biases. The causal effect of a binary disease locus can be described by penetrance model. Genetically, penetrance is the proportion of individuals with a specific genotype who manifest the genotype at the phenotypic level (Hirschhorn and Daly, ).For a diallelic disease locus A, if the genotypes of this locus are indexed by i (i = 0, 1, and 2) for AA, Aa, and aa, where i is the number of risk.